Welcome to Mixed and Multimethod Research for PhD Students

Description: 

This intensive three-day workshop provides PhD students with a deep dive into mixed and multimethod research approaches, using peer and problem-based learning (PBL) methods. Designed for doctoral researchers across the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) and selected participants from other faculties, the course balances theoretical discussions with applied exercises (supervised and unsupervised), networking opportunities, and publication-oriented insights.

The workshop equips students with the ability to critically evaluate and apply mixed and multimethod research designs, fostering a nuanced understanding of their epistemological foundations, typologies, and best practices. Through a combination of lectures, debates, editorial discussions, and student-led presentations, participants will refine their research questions, develop methodologically sound study designs, and gain insight into the peer-review process along with its requirements, potential opportunities and barriers.While combination of quantitative and qualitative research would be at the core of the module, other methods including fs/csQCA (qualitative comparative analysis) and NCA (necessary condition analysis) will also be presented.

The course furthermore incorporates structured feedback and individualized supervision, enabling students to advance their own research projects. By the end of the workshop, students will have developed a mixed or multi-method research proposal or paper draft, which will undergo peer and instructor evaluation as part of the course assessment.

Learning Outcomes

Upon completion, students will be able to:

  1. Distinguish between mixed-method and multimethod research designs.
  2. Critically evaluate the suitability of these approaches for different research question.
  3. Develop and refine a research proposal integrating mixed or multimethod designs.
  4. Reflect on potential editorial and peer review requirements related to multi and mixed method designs.
  5. Apply best practices in designing and implementing mixed-method research.
  6. Articulate the strengths, challenges, and ethical considerations of combining multiple methods.

Assessment & Prerequisites

  • Participants will be required to submit an assignment (~14 days before the final session) demonstrating their ability to apply mixed/multimethod research principles.
  • The assignment will be evaluated with structured feedback from instructors.
  • The course is open to all Danish PhD students, with priority given to AAU Business School (AAUBS) and SSH students with background in (either/or or both) qualitative and quantitative research methods.
  • We invite a short statement of interest along with the application to the course

This course is ideal for PhD students seeking to enhance their methodological toolkit, refine their research approach, and navigate the complexities of publishing in mixed and multimethod research.

Teaching methods:

The module combines

-        Classic lecturing (presentation of types of multi and mixed-methods research along with examples) with

-        PBL- group work (small in-class assignments)

-        Peer learning based on peers presentations

-        Individual work with supervision from the teachers(final assignment).

Groups will be formed before the course starts.

Programme outline:

Course Structure & Key Topics

Day 1: Foundations & Conceptual Debates (F2F)

  • Introduction to mixed and multimethod research
  • Key distinctions: mixed-methods vs. multimethod approaches
  • Editorial perspectives on mixed-method research
  • Group debates on core concepts and methodological challenges
  • Best practices and typologies in mixed-method research
  • Model papers analysis and discussion
  • Group work a model paper within the students own topics
  • The publication process: reviewer feedback and common pitfalls
  • Networking dinner to foster academic connections

Day 2: Student Presentations & Supervision (F2F)

  • Presentation and discussion of students’ mixed/multimethod paper ideas
  • Individualized Q&A and supervision sessions with instructors
  • Refinement of research proposals and methodological frameworks
  • Preparation for assignment submission

Day 3: Assignments & Synthesis (F2F/Hybrid)

  • Takeaways from assignments and feedback discussions
  • Student presentations of their assignments
  • Final reflections and additional presentations (if needed)
Course wrap-up and next steps for publication or further development


Description of paper requirements, if applicable:

  • The assignment paper shall not exceed 3 standard Word pages. It shall include the following:
  • RQ clearly stated
  • Brief summary of the theoretical background (not more than a page)
  • A detailed design with use of multi/mixed methods including reflection on the type (see typologies introduced in the module) and the pros/cons of different methods.

Key literature:

Mandatory literature:

Wellman, N., Tröster, C., Grimes, M., Roberson, Q., Rink, F., & Gruber, M. (2023). Publishing multimethod research in AMJ: A review and best-practice recommendations. Academy of Management Journal, 66(4), 1007-1015.

Sætre, A. S., & Van de Ven, A. (2021). Generating theory by abduction. Academy of Management Review46(4), 684-701.

Bliese, P. D., Certo, S. T., Smith, A. D., Wang, M., & Gruber, M. (2024). Strengthening theory–methods–data links. Academy of Management Journal67(4), 893-902.

Hymer, C. B., & Smith, A. D. (2024). Making exceptions exceptional: A cross-methodological review and future research agenda. Journal of Management50(6), 2374-2402.

Kumar, P., Nowinska, A., & Zaheer, A. (2025). The Paradox of Spatial and Relational Embeddedness: Tie Reinitiation after a Trust Violation. Academy of Management Journal, 68(1), 81-107.

Andersen, K. V., Lorenzen, M., & Nowinska, A. U. (2024). Scarce resources or damaged goods? On the legitimacy of laidoff workers following MNC failure. Global Strategy Journal14(3), 604-634.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. P. (2007). Mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA.

Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research209, 209-240.

Ter Wal, A. L., Criscuolo, P., & Salter, A. (2023). Inside-out, outside-in, or all-in-one? The role of network sequencing in the elaboration of ideas. Academy of Management Journal66(2), 432-461.

Nygaard, K, Brix, J, & Graversgaard, M. (2025) We Might Disagree But Can We Make It Work? (upload)

Suggested literature:

Nowińska, A., & Pedersen, T. (2024). Project managers and decision making: Conditional cognitive switching and rationally stepping up. Long Range Planning57(1), 102414. TO BE DISCUSSED

Organizer: 

Agnieszka Nowinska, Business School, International Business

Kenneth Nygaard, Business School, Strategy, Organization, and Management

Lecturers: 

Agnieszka Nowinska, Business School, International Business

Kenneth Nygaard, Business School, Strategy, Organization, and Management

ECTS: 
3

Time: 
30-31 of October: Day 1 and 2, 5 of December: Day 3 


Place: 

Zip code: 


City:
Aalborg

Maximal number of participants:
14

Deadline: 
9 October 2025

Important information concerning PhD courses: 

There is a no-show fee of DKK 3,000 for each course where the student does not show up. Cancellations are accepted no later than 2 weeks before the start of the course. Registered illness is of course an acceptable reason for not showing up on those days. Furthermore, all courses open for registration approximately four months before start of the course.

We cannot ensure any seats before the deadline for enrolment, all participants will be informed after the deadline, approximately 3 weeks before the start of the course.

For inquiries regarding registration, cancellation or waiting list, please contact the PhD administration at aauphd@adm.aau.dk When contacting us please state the course title and course period. Thank you.


Welcome to the course – Data Management (2025)

In this course you will get a thorough introduction to the value and importance of Data Management and how to do it. Data management is becoming more and more of a requirement by directives, institutions, and funders. The aim is to help you with your own data management by providing background, practice, and tools.

Our focus will be on 2 main topics and how they connect.

  • The FAIR-principles for research data
  • The Data Management Plan (template)

The course will introduce the FAIR principles, why they are important, and how to implement them in your research. We will go through the topics of the typical data management plan, you will work on your own as part of the homework, and we will discuss each other’s experiences.

The course is split in two workshops. 1 full day and ½ a day two weeks apart.

Before the 1st day of teaching, 4 hours of homework is expected to get an introduction to the topics and materials. Before the 2nd day, you are expected to do 15 hours of homework drafting aDMP and a dataset-exercise. At sign-up, you will be enrolled in both workshops, and attendance at both are required to pass. 

Enrolment, details and information: 

Enrolment link: https://phd.moodle.aau.dk/course/view.php?id=2591

Welcome to Academic Information Searching: Methods, Sources and Documentation

Description:

The objective of this course is to provide an understanding of the various aspects that are important when searching for literature as part of your PhD

We recommend that you take this course in the beginning of your PhD.


The course covers these areas:

Structured literature search – How to apply a structured method to prepare and carry out your search e.g. for a literature review

Evaluating and organising your search - How to prepare and apply relevant criteria for assessing and documenting the search results. How reference management tools can facilitate the process of organising search results

Other perspectives on searching – How to use text mining, citation search and other tools to find relevant literature

The course is a “toolbox for research”-course with a mix of presentations and hands-on activities, either individually focusing on your own PhD-project or in small groups with a shared focus. Remember to bring your computer.

Preparation prior to the course: Please read the articles on the reading list (will be attached later). 

Assignments:

There will be both class activities and a home assignment. The home assignment will be introduced during the course. You are required to complete the assignment after the course and hand it in by a specific date, usually a week later

Enrolment, details and information: 

https://phd.moodle.aau.dk/course/view.php?id=2528 – April

https://phd.moodle.aau.dk/course/view.php?id=2526 – November

https://phd.moodle.aau.dk/course/view.php?id=2527 – November

https://phd.moodle.aau.dk/course/view.php?id=2529 – November



Welcome to AI for the People

Description: The notion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) dates back approx. 70 years as a research field and even longer if one considers fiction writers. A number of different definitions of AI has been suggested over the years, but none seem to capture what AI is. This might be due to the fact that AI is about computer algorithms that behave intelligently. And since the capabilities of computer algorithms improve over time, no static definition is possible.

One aspect of AI is the ability to learn or adapt dynamically. This concept has inspired numerous Sci-fi books and movies with the underlying theme of man vs AI (often manifested in a robot). From this follows naturally ethical and regulatory considerations. But until recently, such considerations (see for example the three Robotic laws defined by the sci-fi writer I. Asimov) have been speculative since current AI algorithms (and their manifestation in mechanical devices) have performed poorly and hence never left university labs around the world. Recently, however, fast hardware and massive amount of data have allowed revisiting one particular AI algorithm invented in the 80s, namely Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and increasing the size of the networks used in these models. This was exemplified via image processing for recognizing hand-written digits and resulted in amazing results. Inspired by this success ANN (now known as Deep Learning (DL)) was quickly picked up by other research fields where similar successes have been witnessed.

DL algorithms can now outperform humans on a number of tasks. Moreover, they can, to a certain degree, learn new tasks. An important point in this regard is that the algorithm is so complex that it is next to impossible to understand its inner workings. So, we seem to be facing a reality where AI, in a not too distant future, will be used to make decisions (simply because it is of better than humans). This raises a number of ethical and regulative questions such as, for instance, 1) how we ensure that AI systems are not discriminating against certain groups in the population, 2) how do we ensure transparency about the decisions made by AI systems, and relatedly 3) could and should individuals be given a substantial right to an explanation of decisions made by such systems and a substantial right not to be subjected to automated decision-making (GDPR). Since many of the currently developed AI systems operate on the basis of large amounts of data, the development and use of such systems also reinvigorate the ethical issues related to ‘Big data’. Finally, there are problems related to the efficacy and safety of AI systems. This raises questions not only of how appropriate monitoring of the development of these systems can be secured, but also and more importantly about the appropriate domains for use.

These questions and related questions are the core focus of the PhD course on ‘AI for the people’. The aim is to raise an awareness in the participants. To this end the course will be a combination of lectures, debates and an assignment, and includes the following topics:

    • Introduction to AI
    • Ethical issues in the development and use of AI
    • Industry perspective on AI

Prerequisites: None - besides an open mind and interest in AI and how it is affecting society and individuals.

Enrolment, details and information: 

https://phd.moodle.aau.dk/course/view.php?id=2485 - October


Welcome to Applying the Danish Code of Conduct

Description: 

This course examines the Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity that guides research practices of scientists, researchers and their collaborators. The course will briefly introduce the principles of research integrity, dwell on the basic standards for conducting responsible research - from the planning phase to the dissemination of results, and also shortly introduce the current administration for misconducts. The course is based on the Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Ministry of Higher Education and Science, 2014), that was accepted by all Danish Universities. The course will include cases and supplementary material to illustrate research integrity through examples participants can work with and think about.

Before the course date, it is expected that the online lectures have been gone though as preparation for the course. The actual date of the course will consist of mostly group-based workshops, including discussions pertaining to the participants' own challenges. It is an advantage than in the preparation to also look at the action point plan that is to be submitted after the course.

Participants will receive the detailed program, materials, and instructions for preparation in due time of the course. Around 20 hours of work prior to and after the course shall be expected.

Organizers: 

Associate Professor Henrik Sørensen, Associate Professor Mette Ebbesen Department of Sustainability and Planning, Associate Professor Jes Lynning Harfeld, Professor Pascal Madeleine and Clinical Associate Professor Salome Kristensen 

Lecturers: 

Associate Professor Henrik Sørensen Department of the Built Environment, Associate Professor Mette Ebbesen Department of Sustainability and Planning, Associate Professor Jes Lynning Harfeld Department of Culture and Learning, Professor Pascal Madeleine Department of Health Science and Technology, Clinical Associate Professor Salome Kristensen Department of Clinical Medicine, Susanne Andersen, Grants & Contracts, Charlotte Høj Mariendal, Grants & Contracts, and Kamilla Hall Kragelund, CLAAUDIA.

Enrolment, details and information: 

https://phd.moodle.aau.dk/course/view.php?id=2492 - May

https://phd.moodle.aau.dk/course/view.php?id=2493 – August

https://phd.moodle.aau.dk/course/view.php?id=2494 – October

https://phd.moodle.aau.dk/course/view.php?id=2495 – December


Welcome to University Teaching in Social Science and Humanities

Description:

The course objective is to develop participants’ foundational capacity toteach in a university setting. Specifically, the course aims to develop PhD students’ teaching competencies equivalent to level 1 of the Danish framework for advancing university pedagogy (https://www.iaspbl.aau.dk/projects/danish-framework-for-advancing-university-pedagogy).

Requirements:

The basis of the course is the practice of the participants. Thus, it is an absolute requirement that participants hold teaching obligations the semester they follow the course.

Timeframe:

The course is spread out over more or less an entire semester to allow participants to experiment with their own teaching and receive feedback in the course.

The course opens with a full day (9-16). Followed by four half days (9-12.30) a month between each day

This opening day is placed before the beginning of the semester (Ultimo January/ Ultimo August). The day provides a basic introduction to higher education pedagogy. Furthermore, participants are divided into small groups or professional learning communities (PLC’s) in which the participants will work the rest of the course. PLC’s will meet and discuss teaching experiences at every meeting.

Overall Learning Objectives:

  • The overall learning objectives link to the Danish framework of advancing university pedagogy and ensure that participants under supervision are able to:
  • Plan and carry out individual teaching and supervision activities
  • Organize and carry out assessment
  • Evaluate their teaching and teaching activities

Further, the course ensures that participants can:

  • Create a constructive learning-oriented teaching environment
  • Participate in collaboration on teaching with peers
  • Identify resources for developing teaching quality

Teaching methods:

The course combines short lectures with student centred activities such as training exercises, group discussions, peer observation and feedback. The methods adopted will be discussed as exemplars of teaching strategies.

Description of teaching portfolio:

Participants are required to create a teaching portfolio. They will receive instructions in creating a portfolio and they will be required to give each other feedback on their respective portfolio. The portfolio can be in writing. However, participants’ will be encouraged to experiment with form and content. Furthermore, the course will discuss the requirements of a well-functioning portfolio in future job applications. 

Programme day one:

Structure:

Program Opening day

  • 9.00-10.00: Welcome, introduction to the program
  • 10.00-11.00: University teaching at a PBL university
  • 11.00-12.00: Group supervision
  • 12.00: Lunch
  • 13-14: Lecturing
  • 14:00: First PLC meeting
  • 15.30: wrapping up

Program PLC meetings:

Each PLC meeting is divided into two sections. In the first 1½ hours a theme is discussed. Typically, one of the conveners will open with a short presentation to be discussed by the group afterwards. The group is also required to read texts in relation to the theme of the day sent out before the PLC meeting. These texts will likewise be included in the conversation. Theme of the day is decided by the group on the prior meeting. Example of themes could be Lecturing, group examination, groups supervision and group conflict and more. The other half of the meeting takes place in the PLC’s in which participants discuss their own teaching experiences. These experiences are used as basis for collective reflections on teaching and learning. Finally, each day ends with a lunch (12-12.30). In this way the idea is that the course will not only provide participants with theoretical and practical knowledge about university teaching but also help them establish a social network across departments.

Peer observations and supervision:  

Between each PLC meeting participants are to engage in peer supervision, which involves observation of each other’s teaching followed by peer supervision. Participants will receive training in teaching observations and peer supervision prior to the first round of observations.

We are of course aware that not everybody will have teaching obligations from one month to the next but hopefully at least one will have some obligations between each meeting. Furthermore, other arrangements can be made. One time the group will be invited to observe one of the conveners teach and it is also possible to arrange observations of other (more or less) experienced colleagues.

  • 16.00: See you next time

Organiser:

Nikolaj Stegeager, Culture & Learning, SHARE-PBL


Lecturers:

  • Maria Hvid Stenalt, Culture & Learning, SHARE-PBL
  • Jes Lynning Harfeld, Culture & Learning, RECAST
  • Nikolaj Stegeager, Culture & Learning, SHARE-PBL

ECTS: 
3

Dates and time:

19/8:   9-15.00
26/9:   9-12.30
21/10: 9-12.30
18/11: 9-12.30
12/12: 9-12.30

Place:

AAU Innovate, Thomas Manns Vej 25

Zip code:
9220

City:
Aalborg

Number of seats:
15

Deadline:
29 July 2025

Important information concerning PhD courses: 

There is a no-show fee of DKK 3,000 for each course where the student does not show up. Cancellations are accepted no later than 2 weeks before the start of the course. Registered illness is of course an acceptable reason for not showing up on those days. Furthermore, all courses open for registration approximately four months before start of the course.

We cannot ensure any seats before the deadline for enrolment, all participants will be informed after the deadline, approximately 3 weeks before the start of the course. 

For inquiries regarding registration, cancellation or waiting list, please contact the PhD administration aphdcourses@adm.aau.dk  When contacting us please state the course title and course period. Thank you.


Welcome to Learning to manage your PhD project time

Description:

What we have learned so far from supervising and following PhD students, is that it is difficult to manage the time given during the three years of the PhD program. Time is a scarce resource, and many PhD students are unable to finish within the three-year period. Typically, doctoral students apply for one or even two extensions, effectively spending more than a year above the planned period finalizing their thesis. This is burdensome for all parties involved and can affect the immersion and focus needed for research and writing a thesis that has the substantial contribution, you as a PhD student dream of.

 A brief look into the applications for extension show us that the underlying reasons for extensions are multiple. They can be caused by external issues, such as delays in obtaining data, change of supervisors, trouble in raising sufficient funding and all kinds of family contingencies. Internal issues may be a change in research scope, ideas, lack of relevant courses, planning of external stays, etc. The process of building a professional identity as a researcher is necessary and an integrated part of writing a PhD, but it is also time consuming.

However, while these issues come as a surprise for the individual student, it is our assumption that the impact of them could have been less critical – with a healthy dose of realistic project design and planning in advance. This PhD course tackles this challenge. Our aim is to offer tools and perspectives that will enable you as a PhD student to better manage your time and draw on the support of others in doing so.

We believe that a substantial part of the problems that causes delays are avoidable with careful project design, planning and early intervention. Self-management skills reportedly help doctoral students understand and navigate the perils causing delays and drop-outs (Kearns et al, 2008; Lahenius & Martinsuo, 2008). If PhDs can prepare, detect and accommodate for some of these issues and avoid a considerable part of the delays or at least reducing the impact of such events, they are likely to finalize their studies earlier, with positive impact for the students, the programs, supervisors and the school at large.

To assist PhD student and their supervisors in this, the purpose of this course is to provide PhD students with both insights and tools, that may help them set more realistic targets, manage their time better and prepare in advance for the unexpected.

Even though writing a PhD is an individual endeavor, we know that supervisors and mentors play a crucial role in offering the support that is needed to stay focused and motivated. During this course time will also be reserved for identifying and qualifying how you can use such resources in constructive and professional ways.

Structure & format

The PhD course consists of two full days with preparation for both days. As preparation for the first day, you need to bring a preliminary PhD plan that you have discussed with your supervisor. The first day will be spent on gaining perspectives on:

  • How much time should I set aside for the different research activities?
  • How do I find the relevant PhD courses and make sure I benefit from and integrate the learnings from these courses in my PhD?
  • How do I plan to use my PhD supervisor?
  •  What kind of mentoring do I need?
  • What does it mean to develop a professional identity as a researcher?

There will be articles to read prior to the first day and you will be asked to present your preliminary PhD to the other participants. Fellow PhD students will be asked to provide feedback with the purpose of sharing and generating new perspectives and possible also new ideas. Furthermore, the intention is also to strengthen the relationship between PhD students.

In between the first and second day of the course the PhD student is asked to further develop and qualify the preliminary PhD plan in collaboration with their supervisor(s) and possible also other colleagues.

During the second day, the following topics will be presented and discussed?

  • How do I handle it, when parts of the plan start to fall apart?
  • When will challenges occur and how do I develop the necessary coping mechanisms?
  • How do I make the best use of my supervisors and colleagues in constructive and professional ways?
  • How can I use my fellow PhD students along the way as partners in developing my professional identity as a researcher and in making sure I balance the professional and social aspects of being a PhD student?

You will be asked to discuss and present your developed PhD plan with fellow PhD students. Furthermore, you will get written feedback on the fully developed PhD plan from the teachers on the course. The course is given in English.

Description of paper requirements, if applicable:

Students will be asked to develop and prepare a detailed and annotated time diagram. We have not decided on the detailed format yet


Programme outline:

Schedule Day 1

Time

Activity and literature

Responsible

09:00-09:30

Introduction and presentation rounds

All

09:30-10:30

Phases in a typical PhD process: challenges, concerns and pain points 

Mette, Poul and

Former PhD student as a guest speaker (TBD)

10:30-10:45

Break

 

10:45-12:00

Project management approaches to PhD projects

Poul & Mette

12:00-12:45

Lunch

 

12:45-14:30

Project presentations and comments

Poul & Mette

14:30-15:00

Coffee break

 

15:00-16:00

Project presentation and comments

Poul & Mette

 

Schedule day 2 

Time

Activity and literature

Responsible

09:00-09:30

Short rehersal of aims and rapport

All

09:30-10:30

The ecology context and how it affects time management

Poul

10:30-10:45

Break

 

10:45-12:00

Identifying critical transition points, contingency plans and detecting and reacting on weak signals

Poul & Mette

12:00-12:45

LUNCH

 

12:45-14:30

Presenting revised project plans and learning points – identifying next best step

All

14:30-14:45

Coffee

 

14:45-16:00

Presenting revised plans and learning points – identifying next best step

All



Organizer:

Poul Houman Andersen & Mette Vinther Larsen, AAUBS, Inter-research group venture

Lecturers:

Metter Vinther Larsen (AAUBS), Poul Houman Andersen (AAUBS) and one guest lecturer (former PhD student TBD)

ECTS:
2

Time:
12 May and 16 June

Place:

AAU Aalborg Campus

Zip code:
9220

City:
Aalborg

Number of seats:
16

Deadline:
21 April 

Mandatory literature:

Bui, .T.M. (2014): Student-supervisor expectations in the doctoral supervision process for business and management students, Business and management education in HE, 1, 1, 12-27

Elliot, D. L. & Bengtsen, S. (2020): The hidden curriculum in Doctoral education, chapter 7: A doctoral learning ecology model

Finn, J. (2005): Getting a PhD: An action plan to help manage your research, your supervisor and your project, Taylor & Francis, chapter 3

Lahenius, K. & Martinsuo, M. (2011): Different types of Doctoral Study processes, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 6


Important information concerning PhD courses: 

There is a no-show fee of DKK 3,000 for each course where the student does not show up. Cancellations are accepted no later than 2 weeks before the start of the course. Registered illness is of course an acceptable reason for not showing up on those days. Furthermore, all courses open for registration approximately four months before start of the course.

We cannot ensure any seats before the deadline for enrolment, all participants will be informed after the deadline, approximately 3 weeks before the start of the course.

For inquiries regarding registration, cancellation or waiting list, please contact the PhD administration at phdcourses@adm.aau.dk When contacting us please state the course title and course period. Thank you.